Monday, January 18, 2016

Kazakhstan as a transit state: Benefits, drawbacks, opportunities and threats






By Dmitriy Belyanin

Why it pays to hit the road

 
Kazakhstan's location between China to the East, Russia to the North, and Europe to the West makes it an important transit country in transporting goods between these large markets.  Stability and relative trade openness contribute to Kazakhstan's transit potential.  Given declining oil prices, diversifying Kazakhstan's economy to sustain development becomes crucial.  It can diversify into transit, but it faces hurdles.

Benefits of developing transportation infrastructure

Improving transportation yields scale economies and network effects benefiting such industries as tourism and recreation.  Travelers demand hotels and restaurants.  And demand for transportation infrastructure creates demand for metal and other raw materials, supporting industries that had sold mainly exports.   

Developing transit creates jobs.  Over 72,000 workers build roads alone, covering 2,000 square kilometers, according to Asset Isekeshev, the Minister of Kazakhstan on Investment and Development, as reported by Primeminister.kz.  Through the multiplier effect, this stabilizes an economy suffering from oil price shocks.

Transit of goods brings large revenues.  According to Berik Kamaliyev, former Minister of Transport and Communications, Kazakhstan earned $900 million revenues from cargo shipment in 2010.  Of 15 million tons shipped, 14 million were shipped by railroad, as reported by the News-Kazakhstan Information Agency.  Kazakhstan Temir Zholy, the national railroad company, was selected for the "people's IPO," a privatization of 10% of its shares, which will occur this year.  This may strengthen the underdeveloped stock market in Kazakhstan, which, after two IPOs (KazTransOil in December 2012 and KEGOC in December 2014), still accounts for only 1%, or 899.6 billion KZT, of overall trades on KASE as of 2015.  In 2014, its share was 0.4%, but the increase was due to the purchase of 10% of KazMunaiGas shares by the National Bank of Kazakhstan from Samruk-Kazyna for 750 billion KZT total, not due to the IPOs.  The transaction was meant to strengthen the financial performance of KazMunaiGas, according to Berik Beisengaliyev, member of Samruk-Kazyna, reports National Business. Given the potential of Kazakhstan Temir Zholy to bring revenues to Kazakhstan, its IPO needs effective promotion.

Kazakhstan’s logistics rankings and their relevance to transit

Developing Kazakhstan as a transit state reflects its commitment to free trade, since transit facilities can be used to import and export.  A transit state must have a liberal customs regime.  If it hinders imports, it is less likely to have transit.  

Kazakhstan belongs to the Eurasian Economic Union and the World Trade Organization.  The country is also taking part in the New Silk Road, which will be a road network linking China and Europe through the former Soviet Union and the Middle East.  The first train of the New Silk Road passes through Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Georgia, bypassing Russia. 

Before the New Silk Road, shipments took about 40 days to reach Europe from China.  Now, shipments can reach Georgia in 8-10 days, and various European countries in 3-5 days, reports Focht.  Quicker transit reduces costs and boosts demand.

The country still ranks 88th on the 2014 World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index (LPI), with a score of 2.70.  Germany, with a score of 4.12, ranks first. Russia, a key trading partner, has a score of 2.69, ranking 90th. China, another key partner, has a score of 3.53 and ranks 28th.  Kazakhstan performs worst in customs (2.33) and best in timeliness (3.24). 

The table below presents the Index for key European countries, countries that participate (or may participate) in the New Silk Road, and countries affected (because of embargos).  Kazakhstan performs better than many neighbors but much worse than some European countries.  Its infrastructure is average by standards in the Commonwealth of Independent States, and so is dealing with international shipments, but it is doing relatively well in logistics competence and tracking and tracing.
Country
Germany
1
4.12
4.10
4.32
3.74
4.12
4.17
4.36
United Kingdom
4
4.01
3.94
4.16
3.63
4.03
4.08
4.33
France
13
3.85
3.65
3.98
3.68
3.75
3.89
4.17
Italy
20
3.69
3.36
3.78
3.54
3.62
3.84
4.05
China
28
3.53
3.21
3.67
3.50
3.46
3.50
3.87
Turkey
30
3.50
3.23
3.53
3.18
3.64
3.77
3.68
Ukraine
61
2.98
2.69
2.65
2.95
2.84
3.20
3.
Kazakhstan
88
2.70
2.33
2.38
2.68
2.72
2.83
3.24
Russia
90
2.69
2.20
2.59
2.64
2.74
2.85
3.14
Armenia
92
2.67
2.62
2.38
2.75
2.75
2.50
3.00
Belarus
99
2.64
2.50
2.55
2.74
2.46
2.51
3.05
Tajikistan
114
2.53
2.35
2.36
2.73
2.47
2.47
2.74
Georgia
116
2.51
2.21
2.42
2.32
2.44
2.59
3.09
Azerbaijan
125
2.45
2.57
2.71
2.57
2.14
2.14
2.57
Uzbekistan
129
2.39
1.80
2.01
2.23
2.37
2.87
3.08
Turkmenistan
140
2.30
2.31
2.06
2.56
2.07
2.32
2.45
Kyrgyz Republic
149
2.21
2.03
2.05
2.43
2.13
2.20
2.36
Table 1: Logistics Performance Index components for selected countries

Opportunities and threats arising from conditions in neighboring countries

Russia’s role in trade and transit decreased due to the embargo on its imports of European and Turkish goods.  Goods subject to the embargo that were being shipped through Russia into other transition countries, could be destroyed by Russian authorities, since the Kremlin feared that they would be sold in Russia in violation of the embargo rather than in the intended country of destination.  
Russian policy towards imports from other countries, too, is subject to greater restrictions than Kazakhstan’s.  For example, when Kazakhstan joined the World Trade Organization, it was decided that lower duties than the Unified Customs Tariff of the Eurasian Economic Union would apply for these imports: Medicines, medical equipment, manufacturing equipment, and transportation, including personal vehicles, reports Lykova.  This factor makes Kazakhstan more attractive, but it can also create pressures on the country to restrict trade in order to match the policies of other members of the Eurasian Economic Union. 
Kazakhstan and China cooperate on infrastructure.  At the end of 2014, a joint Kazakh-Chinese Direct Investment Fund was created with a capitalization of $500 million.  The Fund will finance infrastructure and industrialization projects under the Nurly Zhol Program.  And a potential financier of the New Silk Road is the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, with 57 prospective member states, founded by the Chinese government in response to the slow pace of reforms of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in developing countries, reports Gaifutdinova from Forbes.kz.

Growing economic cooperation between Russia and other major players around the region, such as Iran and India, may involve Kazakhstan more deeply in trade as well as create joint enterprises.  For example, in cooperation with China and Iran, Kazakhstan is to build a $6 billion oil refinery.  Construction begins this year.  The project is supposed to overcome fuel shortages in Kazakhstan and contribute to lower fuel prices, reports Tonkonog-Daribayeva from BNews.kz.  Earlier, in December 2014, a railroad linking Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Iran was completed.  It will eventually be integrated with other routes of the New Silk Road, carrying up to 10 million tons of cargo annually, says Dknews.

In December 2015, China proposed a free trade zone under the Shanghai Cooperation Organization by 2020, reports Sputnik.  Belarus, India, Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan, observers in the organization, may become full members.  The free trade zone will expand transit opportunities.

China may also join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a free trade agreement that includes 12 countries in the Pacific Rim, accounting for 40% of the world’s GDP (United States, Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam, Singapore, Brunei, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Mexico, Chile and Peru), which can make it tougher for China’s neighbors in other directions to compete for the Chinese market.  John Kerry, the US secretary of state, has invited Russia and China to join the Partnership, which creates the possibility that Kazakhstan will join someday.  According to Christian Gomez of the New American magazine, “the plan was to include Russia and China from the start.”  Due to geopolitical tensions, however, Russia is extremely unlikely to accept the invitation soon, since the United States is the chief party in the agreement.  China, too, is unlikely, but it may join if the economic slowdown there and in Europe makes trade between them unprofitable.    

Following Russia, Kazakhstan is likely to face more barriers if China joins the TPP. 
The Middle East and South Asia are likely to become more tense and unstable in the next few years.  This can undermine the efforts of increasing transit and result in losses.  It can also aggravate the problem of refugees and illegal immigration into Europe, inducing tax increases, government spending and unemployment, cutting import demand and undermining transit there. The geopolitical neutrality of Kazakhstan may be challenged as well.

Furthermore, the continuing economic slowdown can impede Kazakhstan’s transit potential.   In the October 2015 World Economic Outlook Database, the IMF projects that the rate of real GDP growth in China will decrease from 7.3% in 2014 to 6.81% in 2015 and 6.3% in 2016.  The growth rate in exports of goods is projected to decrease from 5.14% in 2014 to 3% in 2015 and is expected to recover to 3.5% in 2016.  This decrease will reduce exports, including shipments through Kazakhstan.  Imports into Kazakhstan are to decline by 12.32% in 2014 and by 1.06% in 2015, with a slight resurgence of 0.83% in 2016. 
Trade and GDP have fallen or are falling for other participants of the New Silk Road.  Table 2 forecasts real GDP and external trade dynamics of the countries that took part in the first New Silk Road route.  (Because the October 2015 database was created before the Russian-Turkish conflict, the table excludes Turkey.  But we can easily assume that the conflict will further decrease trade, since Turkey is an important trading partner.)  Because the Kazakh tenge has been depreciating relative to the dollar quicker than the Chinese yuan does, exporters to Kazakhstan will lose.  Coordination of monetary policies may be used to stabilize trade and transit. 
Country
Parameter, % change
2013
2014
2015E
2016F
2017F
China
Real GDP Growth
7.685
7.300
6.813
6.300
6.000
China
Volume of Imports of goods
9.702
4.580
2.471
3.532
4.164
China
Volume of exports of goods
9.583
5.139
3.000
3.500
4.189
Kazakhstan
Real GDP Growth
6.000
4.300
1.501
2.355
3.798
Kazakhstan
Volume of Imports of goods
4.852
-12.324
-1.064
0.835
2.209
Kazakhstan
Volume of exports of goods
-0.531
-4.695
-23.152
-4.438
10.578
Azerbaijan
Real GDP Growth
5.803
2.793
4.041
2.530
2.861
Azerbaijan
Volume of Imports of goods
8.696
-14.471
7.015
-9.310
3.089
Azerbaijan
Volume of exports of goods
-1.727
-4.133
-1.921
0.151
-1.550
Georgia
Real GDP Growth
3.320
4.766
1.977
2.960
4.951
Georgia
Volume of Imports of goods
2.862
14.604
-4.203
0.661
6.049
Georgia
Volume of exports of goods
29.884
-0.272
-10.052
5.475
7.940
E-estimated, F-forecasted
Table 2: Actual and Forecasted Real GDP Growth and External Trade Dynamics of the Main Participants of the New Silk Road (2013-2017)
Source: International Monetary Fund, October 2015 World Economic Outlook Database

Domestic Considerations

Modernization of roads, railroads and railroad stations, bus terminals, airports and sea ports implies a lot of government spending. Citizens may prefer direct support of sectors benefiting from improved transportation.   
Also, if the government finances their modernization by increasing taxes or cutting social expenditures excessively, the idea may be unpopular and may conflict with other worthy projects.  Relying excessively on the money from the National Fund, too, would be risky, given the turbulent global economy.   (In practice, 686 billion KZT were allocated from the National Fund in 2015 to implement the “Nurly Zhol” Program, including modernization of infrastructure, as reported by Forbes.kz, but the President later restricted use of the Fund.)  Infant industries, which may need temporary high trade restrictions, will find it difficult to compete under the low tariffs necessary for efficient transit.  Transition countries like Kazakhstan may want to imitate Russia’s import substitution with their own trade barriers.  The projects must be implemented quickly to minimize the payback period, but not at the expense of quality.  Finally, commitment to free trade and free enterprise must continue.

Conclusion

By developing as a transit state, Kazakhstan can earn substantial revenues, develop industries such as tourism, take advantage of scale economies and network effects, and create jobs.  In international agreements, Kazakhstan has committed to free trade, which a transit state needs. 
Kazakhstan’s logistics must improve.  In the face of recession, geopolitical turbulence, instability in the Middle East and southern Asia, and the refugee crisis in Europe, development of Kazakhstan as a transit state may be challenged.  Infant industries may lobby for trade restrictions which undermine Kazakhstan’s transit potential.  But the payoff to good transit justifies tackling these knotty problems.

Dmitriy Belyanin has a Master’s degree of Business Administration in Finance and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from KIMEP University.  Since 2007, he has been writing on issues in economics and finance ranging from stock markets to environmental economics. He is the associate editor of this blog.

References

N. Bakhytzhanova. Strategy Kazakhstan-2050: Goals, tools and new economic and youth policy.  www.yvision.kz/post/425894.  2015.

Dknews. The first lot of Kazakhstani cargo has been shipped to Iran through the Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan-Iran railroad.  Delovoi Kazakhstan. 2015.  

E. Focht.  The first train on the New Silk Road, bypassing Russia, came to Georgia.  www.rbc.ru/business/13/12/2015/566d50109a79472274a8feec. 2015.

V. Gaifutdinova.  The Chinese Silk Road and “Nurly Zhol” will go along the same road. www.forbes.kz/finances/integration/kitayskiy_shelkovyiy_put_i_nurlyi_jol_poydut_odnoy_dorogoy. 2015.

Heritage Foundation.  2015 Index of Economic Freedom. www.heritage.org/index/ranking.  2015.
Kazakhstan Stock Exchange.  Statistics.  www.kase.kz/ru/statistic.  2015.

International Monetary Fund. China.  October 2015 World Economic Outlook Database. www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/weodata/weoselgr.aspx. 2015.

International Monetary Fund. Kazakhstan. October 2015 World Economic Outlook Database.  www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/weodata/weoselgr.aspx. 2015.

National Business  KazMunaiGas concluded the transaction on selling its shares to the National Bank. www.nb.kz/7591.  2015.

N. Lykova, “Import duties in the RK will be lower than the Unified Customs Tariff of the EAEU” - Z. Aitzhanova.  BNews.kz. www.bnews.kz/ru/news/WTO/ekonomika_i_biznes/rinki/importnie_poshlini_v_rk_budut_nizhe_edinogo_tamozhennogo_tarifa_eaes__zhaitzhanova-2015_11_24-1193507. 2015.

D. Mukhtarov. The share of the transportation industry in GDP of Kazakhstan exceeded 7%.  Trend Information Agency.  www.trend.az/business/economy/2276985.html. 2014.

News-Kazakhstan.  Kazakhstan plans to earn about 900 million U.S. dollars on transit.”  www.newskaz.ru/economy/20111110/2108249.html. 2011.

Primeminister.kz. The New Silk Road will open for Kazakhstan unique opportunities for accessing the world markets. www.primeminister.kz/article/view/34. 2015.

E. Romanko and A. Musabekova.  The development of transportation logistics in the Republic of Kazakhstan.  Karaganda State University Herald.  www.articlekz.com/article/8515. 2014.

Sputnik.   SCO free trade zone may be established by 2020. www.sputniknews.com/politics/20151215/1031751925/chinaoffers-free-trade-sco.html. 2015.

The World Bank.  Logistics Performance Index.  www.lpi.worldbank.org/international/global. 2015.

O. Tonkonog-Daribayeva. Kazakhstan and Iran will build an oil refinery with a value amounting to 6 billion dollars. www.bnews.kz/ru/news/politika/vnutrennyaya_i_vneshnyaya_politika/kazahstan_i_iran_postroyat_neftepererabativaushchii_zavod_stoimostu_6_mlrd_dollarov_video-2015_07_22-1091479. 2015.

Thursday, January 14, 2016

Tenge tales



Kazakhstan’s currency is back in a free fall.  How will this affect us?

The exchange rate of tenge for a dollar has risen to 365.  Two years ago, it was 155; the tenge has lost three-fourths of its power to purchase foreign goods.  Why?  Well, in 2014, the National Bank of Kazakhstan managed the exchange rate; but since last August, it has let the tenge float.  And it floats like a helium balloon; on January 4, just before China devalued the yuan, the tenge exchange rate was below 340.

In the long run, this nominal exchange rate (that is, unadjusted for prices) should tend toward the value that will hold the real exchange rate (that is, adjusted for prices) to 100. This is the equilibrium rate because it ensures that goods in Kazakhstan sell for the same dollar price as in the US (or for the same tenge price, if you prefer). Depending on the inflation rate assumed, the nominal exchange rate for a long-run equilibrium may be around 328 to 335.

But in the short run, anything goes. The tenge is overshooting. My guess is that the nominal rate is headed for 400, since that is an easier focal point for traders to anticipate than, say, 399 or 401.

Meanwhile, tenge savers – that is, poor households in Kazakhstan – are wiped out.  Rich households will convert to dollars as long as the government permits it.  But the currency exchange points in Turkmenistan reportedly are already refusing to pay out dollars.  If that report is correct, it may be just a matter of time before exchange points here refuse, too.  In that case, the tenge would depreciate even more rapidly.

Eventually, this depreciation will lower dollar prices of Kazakhstani exports, like oil and gas.  The world will buy more of our exports, and our income will rise. But most people want to know what will happen now, not next year.  Unfortunately, the news is bad.  Inflation -- the general rate of price increases -- will crank up again.  This is partly because producers in Kazakhstan must raise the prices of their products in order to pay for imported inputs, which cost more tenge than before.

The central bank says it targets inflation within a range of 6% to 8% per year. In annual terms, the inflation rate last month was 13.6%. It is even less likely now that the Bank will be able to hit its target.

Can’t it do anything to improve its aim?  Well, it could raise interest rates again; in October, it boosted the annual base rate to 16% from 12%.  Higher rates discourage borrowing and thus spending, relieving the pressure on prices.  But borrowing is already low. Adjusted for consumer inflation, loans by Kazakhstani banks in November were nearly 10% below the figure for November 2014.

Or the Bank could cut the money supply again; with fewer tenge chasing each product, prices will slow down. But this would probably take months to work.  And the Bank doesn’t have much to work with:  In November, the supply of cash and checkable accounts was only 1.1% higher than in December 2014.

The only way that the National Bank can avoid a surge in inflation in the weeks to come is to wade back into the foreign exchange market, buying tenge and selling dollars. But this is precisely what the Bank since August has repeatedly said it would not do.

So, what can we do?  Buy dollars and pray. --Leon Taylor tayloralmaty@gmail.com

Notes

All statistics in this post are from the National Bank of Kazakhstan (nationalbank.kz) except for the US inflation rate, which is from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (bls.gov), and daily tenge exchange rates over the past month, which are from XE.com.

To calculate the nominal exchange rate in a long-run equilibrium, I note that Kazakhstan’s real exchange rate with respect to the US was 148 in the third quarter of 2015, the most recent rate reported by the National Bank.  Since the Bank defines a rise in the real rate as appreciation, the tenge was overvalued by 48%. 

The Bank formula for the real exchange rate is (100/e)*(Pk/Pus), where e is the nominal exchange rate of tenge for a US dollar, Pk is the price level in Kazakhstan, and Pus is the price level in the US.  (Yes, this formula is the inverse of the one used in many textbooks on international economics.) Solving for the relative price level, Pk/Pus = 1.48e.

I seek the equilibrium nominal exchange rate for April 1, 2016, which I will denote as e1.  This must satisfy 
100 = (100/e1)*((Pk(1+p)/Pus)).

Here, p is the rate of inflation in Kazakhstan, relative to the rate in the US.

The annual relative rate of inflation was 8% over the second half of 2015 but nearly 14% in December 2015.  Let's calculate the equilibrium exchange rate for both rates of inflation; that will give us a range of likely exchange rates.  I assume that the relative price structure, Pk/Pus, will be the same on April 1, 2016, as in the third quarter of 2015.  Thus

e1 = (1.48)*(1+p1)*e,

where p1 is the 6-month rate of inflation.  (Why six months?  Because we want the April 1 exchange rate, which occurs six  months after the end of the third quarter of 2015.) I set e = 213.1.  With these assumptions, I calculate e1 to be between 328 (which assumes 8% annual inflation) and 335 (14% inflation).

These calculations of an equilibrium rate are rough because they ignore transport costs as well as the fact that Kazakhstanis do not consume the same goods as Americans.


References

Marat Gurt.  Turkmenistan exchange bureaus stop selling foreign currency.  Reuters.  January 12, 2016.