Do low interest rates signal trouble?
Some shock waves from Europe’s economy
reach as far as Kazakhstan . Two weeks ago, the European Central Bank
announced a negative interest rate for regional banks holding their deposits
there. These banks will have to pay for
the privilege of lending their money to the ECB.
In a sense, negative interest rates have
been common around the world since the financial crisis of 2008. This refers to interest payments measured in
terms of the goods and services that they can purchase – that is, to “real”
interest rates. In economics, “real”
refers to quantities as opposed to money.
A real interest rate of 5% indicates that the lender can buy 5% more of
autos and bottles than he could have done by spending the principal rather than
lending it. When the real interest rate
is negative – say, -3% -- then the lender loses purchasing power
despite the interest paid to him. He can
buy 3% less of goods than he could have done by foregoing the loan.
The ECB’s novelty was a negative money interest rate. I’ll explain.
Depositors to a bank are its creditors,
since it can put their dollars to work by lending them out or by purchasing
assets like government bonds. (Indeed, a
loan is an asset, since the lender can expect it to pay off.) The ECB is no exception, although it does not
make commercial loans as a rule. A negative
money interest rate of, say, 1% means that banks must pay the ECB 1% of their
deposits there. This is in addition to
the loss of purchasing power that the depositors suffer by leaving their money
at the ECB rather than spending it.
Why might this affect Kazakhstan ? Because the market for financial assets is
global. All assets enable their holders to
consume more tomorrow by consuming less today.
If you buy a 5% bond for $10,000, then you give up $10,000 of spending
today – on a long Caribbean cruise, perhaps – in order to earn $10,500 for
spending next year (add a few lobster dinners to that cruise). The rate of return on any financial asset –
we might as well just call it the “interest rate” – tends to converge on a
common global rate, because the assets market is fast-moving (“liquid,” if you
will). If the common rate is 5%, then a
6% asset will quickly attract buyers, pushing up its price and thus reducing its
rate of return. (Confused? See the Notes.)
The Bankers’
Ball
Today in the West, most interest rates are
close to zero, largely because the central banks in the wake of the financial
crisis printed money as if tomorrow would never come. Increasing the supply of anything will lower
its price; otherwise, the additional units can’t be sold. The price of holding a tenge is the interest
rate, since you must give up the interest payment if you choose not to lend out
the money.
Adjusted for inflation, inflation rates
tend to be higher in Kazakhstan
than in the West, probably because people view investment here as risky and
demand payment for the risk. By adopting
a negative interest rate, the European Central Bank is pressuring rates in the
post-Soviet world to fall, since investors will bid up the price of post-Soviet
assets. For a while, the post-Soviet
banks will smile, since Westerners are lending them more dollars than
before. (To the Westerner, these loans are
assets.) But the banks, giddy with new
dollars, may make the same mistake that they did in 2007 – lending out the
dollars recklessly. If the financed
projects fail, then the banks will be unable to repay Westerners. Once again, the banks will flirt with insolvency.
Of course, the banks will
assure us that they lend with the utmost prudence, that any shortfall of
dollars is temporary. That’s what they
said in 2007, too. –Leon Taylor, tayloralmaty@gmail.com
Notes
1.
Consider a bond that costs $10,000 to buy and that pays off $500 in
interest each year. Its annual rate of
return is $500 / $10,000, or 5%. If its
price rises to $20,000, then its rate of return will fall to $500 / $20,000, or
2.5%. In general, the price of an asset
relates inversely to its rate of return:
When one rises, the other falls.
Reference
Jack Ewing and Neil Irwin. European Central Bank breaks new ground to press
growth. The New York Times. June 5,
2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment