by Dmitriy
Belyanin
The
government of Kazakhstan is throwing a party, and the punch bowl costs billions
of tenge. Prestige, infrastructure improvements, environmental solutions, macroeconomic
stabilization and other doubtless benefits, may cost the country an arm and a
leg.
From
June 10 until September 10, Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan, will host an
international exposition under the theme “Future Energy.” Kazakhstan is the first country in the
Commonwealth of Independent States that the International Exhibitions Bureau
has selected for EXPO. We will see that it is unclear that the Expo will
pay off economically. We shall also assess the relevance of EXPO as an
anti-crisis measure.
Parameters
of EXPO-2017
More
than 111 countries and 18 international organizations will take part in the
exposition. Local companies have provided goods and services worth 492 billion
KZT. Over 300 domestic businesses built and prepared facilities for EXPO. By
around October 2016, the project had helped to create around 50,000 jobs, reports Kazinform. This is about 0.55% of Kazakhstan’s year 2016 workforce of
9,059,000 people, according to the CIA World Factbook.
To raise funds for EXPO-2017, the government
relies on various sources. Over 2014-2016, expenditures from the budget were
433 billion KZT. (This is about 0.15% of the sum of government expenditures for
each year during the period, according to IMF estimates.) The National Fund
will lend 40 billion KZT to construct buildings. Overall, the government would
spend roughly $1.5 billion on the Expo. The government has also been attracting
sponsors, including multinational corporations, which kicked in about 125 million
euro ($140.41 million, or 47.55 billion KZT) by
October 2016, reports Forbes magazine.
Despite
the expense, Astana’s shindig is relatively small. Organizers expect over 2
million visitors and 5 million visits. But
the 2010 exposition in Shanghai attracted 73 million visitors. Each
foreign visitor is expected to stay for about 4 days on average and spend
around $1,500 per day, reports the Atameken National Chamber of
Entrepreneurs. Foreigners, mostly from
the Commonwealth of Independent States and China, would account for 15% of visitors.
Thus, from foreigners alone, revenues of $1.8 billion are expected.
Since
most of the tourists will be Kazakhstanis, one may wonder whether the Expo will
actually generate much revenue -- or merely divert them from other domestic
hotels and restaurants. But the expo
website features advertisements of some hotels and restaurants in various
cities of Kazakhstan. Also, advertisements will be placed near the EXPO
site. To be mentioned on the website, a
hotel, restaurant, taxi station, or another service facility, must become a
partner of the “Recommended by EXPO-2017” Program. A government commission
assesses facilities for such characteristics as fluency of the personnel in
English and access to Wi-Fi. Potential participants who had failed to comply
with the Program’s requirements initially have an indefinite number of chances
to re-apply. In preparing the “Recommended by EXPO-2017” Program, the
organizers drew from the experience of Milan, Sochi, London and Shanghai,
reports Tengri News. The government is taking precautions to ensure that
the few foreign visitors receive a good impression of the country. Still, the government
is interfering in the market, subsidizing promotion of firms asserted to
provide better services.
Political benefits and externalities
The International Exhibitions Bureau selected
Kazakhstan for EXPO-2017 in 2012, after years of lobbying. Of the 156 member
states of the International Exhibitions Bureau, 103 voted for Astana. Leige in
Belgium, the sole rival, received 45 votes.
Hosting the Expo serves political and
economic purposes. Strengthening Astana’s infrastructure should improve the
city’s reputation. Some people have had second thoughts about the wisdom of
moving the capital from Almaty; land improvements in Astana may alter their
opinions. Creating new jobs may attract domestic migrants to Astana. A higher
population density may lead to knowledge spillovers, larger markets, and scale
economies. President Nazarbayev earmarked 29 billion KZT to build an airport
terminal and to reconstruct the runway, enabling Astana’s airport to receive
7.1 million passengers per year, compared with 3.5 million passengers now.
Private direct investment in hotels, apartment buildings and so forth is
estimated at $1 billion. For the airport, “Kazakhstan Temir Zholy,” 100% owned
by the state “Samruk-Kazyna” National Welfare Fund, shelled out 14 billion KZT.
Another 18 billion KZT will be borrowed, reports Forbes.
By spending on rail terminals and airports,
the government may help its visa liberalization to pay off. In 2015, the government deemed that citizens
of the 34 OECD countries, as well as of Malaysia, Singapore and the United Arab
Emirates, could stay in Kazakhstan for 30 days without a visa. Foreign workers
at the Astana Financial Center (which will use Expo infrastructure) and their
families will receive five-year visas.
The government’s role in financing airports
is controversial, since airports encompass both private and public goods. For
example, airports ensure security. The passport and customs control system in
an airport prevents entry and exit of criminals, while flight dispatchers
ensure flight safety. It is not possible to exclude those who do not pay for
this service from receiving the protection. Neither is it possible to ration
the service. Since a private airport cannot collect fees from all who benefit
by the safety it provides, it would produce too little safety. On the other
hand, comfort to passengers is a publicly provided private good. Those not
using the airport do not get the benefit of its cafes and duty free shops, so these
services can be provided privately.
What about the reduction of ill effects from
production, like pollution? The EXPO facilities will rely on alternative
sources of energy, such as photovoltaic panels, wind generators, and heat
pumps, to demonstrate usage of geothermal energy. It is not clear whether their
use after the EXPO will be efficient.
The EXPO as a tool of macroeconomic
stabilization
Akmetzhan Yessimov, chairman of the EXPO-2017
board, had characterized the organization of EXPO as an anti-crisis measure,
pointing out the number of jobs it created. By creating facilities, the
government compensates for declining output in other industries.
By spending more or cutting taxes,
governments hope to raise aggregate demand for a while, which would encourage
firms to produce more, provide more jobs and eventually increase salaries. An
increase in government expenditures has a more powerful effect than a tax cut,
since people save part of the cut. The problem with fiscal expansions, however,
is that workers may be forward-looking and demand wage increases shortly after
an increase in prices, so the effect of the fiscal stimulus may be short-lived.
How forward looking are employers and
employees in Kazakhstan? And how justified is it to stimulate aggregate demand
now? Compared with developed countries, inflation in Kazakhstan has been high,
so people anticipate price increases.
Also, the government may find it hard to push
the unemployment rate much lower. According
to the IMF World Outlook Database, since 2014, unemployment in Kazakhstan has
remained steady at a rate of 5.04%, even though real GDP growth slowed from 6%
in 2013 to 1.16% in 2015 and is estimated at -0.75% for 2016.
How important is EXPO to expansionary fiscal
policy? The table below illustrates changes in total government expenditures
and expenditures on EXPO, during the period 2013-2016:
Subject Descriptor
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
Expenditures on EXPO
|
0
|
20
|
45.5
|
154
|
233.5
|
General government total
expenditures
|
6796.054
|
7130.917
|
8711.454
|
9590.892
|
9765.708
|
Expenditures on EXPO, % change
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
127.50%
|
238.46%
|
51.62%
|
General government total
expenditures, % change
|
13.32%
|
4.93%
|
22.16%
|
10.10%
|
1.82%
|
Expenditures on EXPO/Total
Expenditures, %
|
0.00%
|
0.28%
|
0.52%
|
1.61%
|
2.39%
|
Δ Expenditures on EXPO/ΔTotal
Expenditures, %
|
n/a
|
5.97%
|
1.61%
|
12.34%
|
45.48%
|
Sources: Forbes magazine,
the October 2016 International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook Database,
and author’s calculations
Change in expenditures on EXPO-2017, relative to total
expenditures of the Government of Kazakhstan (2012-2016), bln. KZT
From the table, we can derive arguments both
in favor and against EXPO as an anti-recessionary measure. Expenditures on EXPO
increased the most during 2014 and 2015, when oil prices were declining. But
their share in total expenditures remained small. Furthermore, oil prices have begun
to rise, so the fiscal stimulus is not as necessary as before.
Experiences
of other countries in international expositions
Since the first international exposition in
1851 at London’s Crystal Palace, many countries have hosted expositions that
have made them more recognized worldwide. For example, according to a study of
the Hanover expo, 73% of the countries participating in Expo 2000 participated
mostly to improve the national image.
Countries may also hold expositions to
improve macroeconomic performance. Dubai, selected for the 2020 EXPO,
anticipates over 25 million visitors and 270,000 new jobs in case of winning.
The government expects to earn between $25 billion and $35 billion, and it plans
to spend $6.8 billion on new infrastructure, reports Quartz.
Attracting enough visitors to profit may be
challenging. The Hanover expo attracted 18.1 million visitors, far less than
the 40 million expected. The exposition lead to net losses of 2.4 billion DM ($1.13
billion), about $15 for every German man, woman and child, reports The
Guardian.
Though the Hanover expo did not make money,
noted the Bureau of International Expositions website, it helped to develop the
city by enlarging the streetcar network and creating a third airport terminal,
a road network, and a rail station.
Some expositions had substantial side effects
and expenses. The Shanghai World Expo 2010 cost $4.2 billion, according to
government statistics; but the Chinese news media claimed that the cost of
staging it exceeded $50 billion, more than for the 2008 Olympics in Beijing.
The exposition resulted in many buildings that were not used after the event
and could not be dismantled, said the New York Times. Shanghai revenues
were relatively modest. Ticket sales came to $709 million, half of the exposition’s
revenue. Food services and retailers earned $47.7 million, and sponsors gained
$591 million, reported the Shanghai Expo website.
Some expositions were more successful. The one
in Aichi Prefecture, Japan, generated accounting profits of $90 million, and
much of the area was re-used. A park was created. The house for two characters
of the animated film My neighbor Totoro
was set up there. So was a center preserving the Kaisho Forest.
The key point is this: Accounting profits (the
numbers on the books) are not economic profits (revenues minus true costs, which include values that
could have been realized had the Expo not occurred). Since most visitors will
be domestic, the event will divert revenues from other restaurants and hotels
in Kazakhstan, so it may not benefit the country on net. If the Expo generates
$500 million in revenues but diverts $200 million from tourism elsewhere in
Kazakhstan, the country will gain no more than $300 million. It is not clear
that the government has calculated such opportunity costs.
Obstacles to EXPO’s popularity
Instability or terrorism – like the Aktobe
attack last June -- could cut revenues from the Astana gala. On the other hand,
terrorist threats in Egypt and Turkey may induce Russian tourists to seek
alternatives like Astana. Since Kazakhstan belongs to the Eurasian Economic
Union, the Russian media is likely to laud the Expo to readers who can visit
Kazakhstan without much red tape. The exhibition may also be popular among
tourists from Iran, which has become more open thanks to sanctions relief and a
new reformist Parliament. Westerners may to be more reluctant to visit;
American and European tourists may be unwilling to spend pocket change on an
authoritarian regime.
The magnitude of the event may discourage visitors and participants.
For example, in 2016, Estonia informed Kazakhstan that it would not take part
in EXPO. Participating in EXPO would have cost Estonia 2.2 million euros ($2.42
million, or 828.02 million KZT, based on the year 2016 tenge exchange rate),
and its Ministry of Economy decided that the event was not worth participating
in, reports Kazakhstan Today. In general, the exposition in Astana is a
much less significant event than those in Shanghai and Milan. There will be
fewer pavilions, participating countries, and visitors.
Furthermore, the failure of similar events to
attract enough tourists can make EXPO unpopular. People would not want to be
are among the few attending. The organizers of the Universiade in Almaty, which
took place in February, had expected about 30,000 tourists, but only 2,100 came,
even though schoolteachers and schoolchildren had an additional spring vacation
at that time, reports Kazinform. Unlike the Universiade, EXPO-2017 will take
place during the summer, when most teachers and students will be on vacation.
Conclusion
EXPO-2017
Astana is an extravagant and prestigious project, but not necessarily a profitable
one. The role of EXPO as an anti-crisis measure is also questionable.
Dmitriy Belyanin
has a Master’s degree of Business Administration in Finance and a Bachelor of
Arts degree in Economics from KIMEP University. Since 2007, he has been writing
on issues in economics and finance ranging from stock markets to environmental
economics. He is the associate editor of this blog.
References
Akhmedov,
R. A tourist boom did not happen, due to the Universiade. http://rus.azattyq.org/a/almaty-unversiada-2017-turisty/28275294.html.
2017.
Astana
International Airport. Passenger flow. http://ru.astanaairport.kz/about-airport/production-activities/passenger-traffic/.
2016.
Bureau of International Expositions. 2005 Aichi.
http://www.bie-paris.org/site/en/2005-aichi.
2016.
Bureau
of International Expositions. Expo 2000:
A new importance to the Expo theme. http://www.bie-paris.org/site/en/2000-hannover. 2016.
Bureau
of International Expositions. Expo
Timeline. http://www.bie-paris.org/site/en/expos/past-expos/expo-timeline. 2016.
Danenov, N.
EXPO 2017 and green economy will benefit international development. The Astana Times. http://astanatimes.com/2013/06/expo-2017-and-green-economy-will-benefit-international-development/. 2013.
EXPO
2017. In Kazakhstan, a national lottery,
dedicated to the Astana EXPO-2017 exhibition has begun. https://expo2017astana.com/news/2014/10/v-kazaxstane-startuet-naczionalnaya-lotereya,-posvyashhennaya-vyistavke-astana-ekspo-2017. 2015.
EXPO 2017. EXPO 2017 Partnership Program. https://expo2017astana.com/images/pdf/EXPO2017%20Sponsorship%2017.11.pdf. 2014.
EXPO 2017.
Project “EXPO-2017” - a global project of President N.A.
Nazarbayev. https://expo2017astana.com/en/proekt-ekspo-2017. 2014.
Finprom.kz. Kazakhstan’s external debt amounts to $154
billion. Kapital.https://kapital.kz/finance/52153/vneshnij-dolg-kazahstana-sostavil-154-mlrd.html. 2016.
Focus.kg. Kazakhstan’s external debt amounts to 155.6
billion dollars and each Kazakhstani citizen owes over $8,000 to
foreigners. Gezitter.org. http://www.gezitter.org/economics/47685_vneshniy_dolg_kazahstana_sostavil_1556_mlrd_dollarov_i_kajdyiy_kazahstanets_zadoljal_inostrantsam_bolee_8_tyisyach/. 2015.
Forbes.
Budget
expenditures for EXPO-2017 amounted to 433 billion KZT over three years. http://forbes.kz/process/expertise/zatratyi_na_podgotovku_k_ekspo-2017_sostavili_433_mlrd_tenge_za_tri_goda.
2016.
Forbes.
Why do
foreigners think airports in Kazakhstan resemble bazaars? https://forbes.kz/process/expertise/pochemu_kazahstanskie_aeroportyi_napominayut_inostrantsam_bazaryi.
2015.
Forbes. Yessimov: Sponsors
financed the EXPO-2017 exposition for 125 million euro. http://forbes.kz/news/2016/09/30/newsid_122609.
2016.
Grishin,
S. Kazakhstan is inviting tourists. http://liter.kz/ru/articles/show/9213-kazahstan_zov_t_turistov. 2015.
The Guardian. Is Expo
out of steam? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/oct/31/worlddispatch. 2000.
Hughes,
M. Making an impact: The power of World
Expo. http://vision.ae/articles/making_an_impact_the_power_of_world_expo. 2012.
International
Monetary Fund. October 2016 World Economic Outlook Database. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/02/weodata/weoselgr.aspx.
2016.
Iran EXPO 2015 Milano. About Expo.
http://en.iranexpo2015.ir/?fkeyid=&siteid=5&pageid=1402. 2015.
Kantchev,
G. World expositions can benefit or
haunt host cities. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/26/technology/getting-a-seat-at-the-global-table-for-a-price.html. 2013.
Kapital.
The average
salary of Kazakhstani people is less than $500. https://kapital.kz/economic/47047/srednyaya-zarplata-kazahstancev-menee-500-dollarov.html.
2016.
Kazakhstan
Today. Estonia
will not participate in EXPO-2017. http://kt.kz/rus/expo/estonija_otkazalasj_ot_uchastija_v_expo2017_1153635486.html.
2017.
Kazinform.
Almaty schoolchildren will get an extra vacation, due to the Universiade. http://www.inform.kz/ru/shkol-niki-almaty-vyydut-na-kanikuly-v-yanvare-v-svyazi-s-universiadoy_a2987892.
2017.
Kazinform.
Goods and services for construction of EXPO-2017 cost KZT 492 B.
http://www.inform.kz/en/goods-and-services-for-construction-of-expo-2017-costs-kzt-492-b_a2964452 2016.
Kuo, L. Why cities still vie to host costly and
potentially crippling events like the World Expo. http://qz.com/152242/why-cities-still-vie-to-host-costly-and-potentially-crippling-events-like-the-world-expo/. 2013.
Mail.ru. Turkmenistan opened a new airport, having a
total value of 2.3 billion U.S. dollars. https://news.mail.ru/politics/27168141/. 2016.
The National Chamber of Entrepreneurs of the
Republic of Kazakhstan “Atameken.” The
tourism sector is back in the plus. http://palata.kz/en/articles/23563-turisticheskij-sektor-opyat-v-plyuse. 2016.
Pu,
P. Shanghai Expo playing catch-up with
cost. http://www.china.org.cn/travel/expo2010shanghai/2010-08/09/content_20669780.htm. 2010.
Tengri News. The “Recommended by EXPO-2017” program will
enable increasing the level of service. https://tengrinews.kz/conference/121/. 2015.
Yeleubayeva,
A. The area of the Astana airport will double. https://kapital.kz/economic/38306/plocshad-aeroporta-astany-uvelichat-v-dva-raza.html.
2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment