In August 2015, the central bank of Kazakhstan took
its mitts off the exchange rate, leaving it to the vagaries of the currency
market. From July to September, the number of tenge trading for a dollar rose from
187 to 258 – and averaged 366 in January, a virtual doubling in five months. In
other words, the amount of foreign goods that tenge holders could buy nearly
halved. Who suffered most in this drastic depreciation?
At first glance, you would think that the rich had
more to lose than the poor. Those with tenge wealth saw their dollar value
vanish. The poor had no wealth, much less tenge wealth, so they got off
scot-free.
At second glance, things are not so simple. A depreciation raises local prices, since it
raises foreign demand for local goods, forcing residents to compete for them by
paying more. Some prices rise faster
than others. Who is unlucky enough to face these prices?
A recent study addressed this question by analyzing
the 1994 crash of the Mexican peso.
Political violence and other factors that year caused investors to lose
faith in the peso. To keep it from
weakening in terms of the dollar, the central bank bought pesos and sold
dollars. Since the peso was overvalued,
investors dumped it. By December, the central bank was running out of dollars,
so it floated the peso. The currency tanked, prices soared, and a few banks
collapsed. Sound familiar?
In their careful study of the Mexican crisis, Javier Cravino
and Andrei Levchenko concluded that prices paid by the poorest tenth of the
population nearly doubled while those paid by the richest tenth rose three
fourths. This happened partly because the rich spent more of their income on
services than the poor did. Most services are bought at home, not abroad; so
when the currency goes south, their prices rise less rapidly than those of
traded goods like grain. Even within a
category like food, prices rose more rapidly for the poor, who were accustomed
to buying cheap food from abroad.
Overall, in the two years following the swooning of the peso, the
purchasing power of the poor fell by half but declined less rapidly – by 40% --
for the rich.
Did the 2015 tenge crisis worsen the income
distribution in Kazakhstan as well? A
question, perhaps, for the National Bank. --Leon
Taylor, tayloralmaty@gmail.com
Good
reading
Aldo Musacchio. Mexico's financial crisis of
1994-1995. Harvard Business School
Working Paper. No. 12–101. May 2012.
Wikipedia.
Mexican peso crisis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_peso_crisis
References
Javier Cravino and Andrei A. Levchenko. 2017. The distributional consequences of large
devaluations. American Economic Review 107(11): 3477–3509. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151551.
National Bank of Kazakhstan. Official exchange rates on average for the
period. www.nationalbank.kz
No comments:
Post a Comment