Heavy money

Why is broad money growing like weeds in Kazakhstan?

Since 2011, a broad measure of money supply, M3, has been rising more rapidly than narrower – that is, more liquid – measures in Kazakhstan.  In the past two years, M3 has been more than triple the size of M1, the narrow measure comprised mainly of cash and checking accounts.  The figure for August 2014 was 3.54.  The last time that August M3 was so large was in 2008 (3.26), just before the real estate bubble burst.  Isn’t that a coincidence?

Of course, a high ratio of M3 to M1 does not mean that catastrophe is inevitable – only that it’s possible.  The ratio indicates that illiquid forms of money – that is, forms that are hard to spend quickly – are becoming prevalent.  This may occur because of major projects, which require large and long-term loans.  If these projects introduce Kazakhstan to new and more efficient modes of production, then they may spur economic growth.

But there is another possibility:  Creditors have loaned generously to construction projects, such as those for residential centers and shopping malls, that are risky because they would pay off only in the long run, if ever.  If these projects fail to pay interest in the interim, then lenders of dollars to the banks – dollars that industries require for buying foreign inputs – may pull out their money in the short run, leaving banks and borrowers up the creek.  Falling oil prices may precipitate this dollar flight.

In response, the government blames economic instability on volatile oil prices.  The ostensible solution is to shift investment away from oil and gas and toward industries that prosper when the former don’t.  This will reduce instability at the price of a modest reduction in economic growth, one hopes.

The argument presumes that the subsidized new industries will make money; there is no point in substituting unprofitable industries for a profitable one.   But if they are haymakers, then why didn’t private investors back them in the first place?  Were they ill-informed?  Then the government should inform them, not displace them.  The sneaking suspicion is that the industries are rewarded more for their political connections than for their efficiency.  Exhibit A is tourism in this remote and landlocked country.   --Leon Taylor tayloralmaty@gmail.com

Notes

Data on M1 and M3 are from the National Bank of Kazakhstan (nationalbank.kz).  To control for seasonal factors, I used the August figures for every year beginning with 2000.